Locally advanced breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery and other factors linked to overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment

Nobrega, Gabriela Bezerra and Mota, Bruna Salani and de Freitas, Gabriela Boufelli and Maesaka, Jonathan Yugo and Mota, Rosa Maria Salani and Goncalves, Rodrigo and Trinconi, Angela Francisca and Ricci, Marcos Desidério and Piato, José Roberto and Soares-Jr, José Maria and Baracat, Edmund Chada and Filassi, José Roberto (2023) Locally advanced breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery and other factors linked to overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment. Frontiers in Oncology, 13. ISSN 2234-943X

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/fonc-13-1293288.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/fonc-13-1293288.pdf - Published Version

Download (653kB)

Abstract

Background: Recent data suggest that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may positively impact overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer. However, the role of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 530 LABC patients who underwent surgery after NAT between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes examined included OS, distant recurrence rates (DRR), and loco-regional recurrence rates (LRRs).

Results: Among the 927 breast cancer patients who received NAT, 530 were eligible for our study. Of these, 24.6% underwent BCS, while 75.4% underwent mastectomy (MS). The median follow-up duration was 79 months. BCS patients exhibited a higher pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to those who underwent MS (22.3% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). The 6-year OS rates for BCS and MS were 81.5% and 62%, respectively (p < 0.000). In multivariate OS analysis, MS was associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.678; 95% CI 1.069–2.635; p = 0.024), as was body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.031; 95% CI 1.006–1.058; p = 0.017), and stage IIIB or IIIC (OR 2.450; 95% CI 1.561–3.846; p < 0.000). Conversely, PCR (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.220–0.801; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival. DRR was significantly lower in BCS (15.4%) compared to MS (36.8%) (OR 0.298; 95% CI 0.177–0.504). LRRs were comparable between BCS (9.2%) and MS (9.5%) (OR 0.693; 95% CI 0.347–1.383).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that BCS is oncologically safe, even for patients with large lesions, and is associated with superior OS rates compared to MS. Additionally, lower BMI, lower pretreatment stage, and achieving PCR were associated with improved survival outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: STM Library > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 08 Nov 2023 08:49
Last Modified: 08 Nov 2023 08:49
URI: http://open.journal4submit.com/id/eprint/3198

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item